Radiometric Dating and Creation Science

Creationist claims carbon dating

Morris claimed that free neutrons might

Morris claimed that free neutrons might change the decay rates. That is, the equilibrium point should have long since been reached given the present rate of carbon production and the old age of the earth.

Thus, it gets passed up the food chain. It's not clear to me what Dr. Despite this, creationist Dr. For some reason, creationists seem obsessed with dinosaurs and especially with proving that they lived with humans. You can be as sure as it's possible to be that any creationist who claims otherwise it either lying or has been fooled by liars.

At that point it's just a routine exercise in math. Finally, when the water reaches a certain level in the barrel, the amount of water going into the barrel is equal to the amount leaking out the perforated sides. Because of background radiation, that's about as far as one can normally go with this counting method. There is a fourth type of decay that can be affected by physical and chemical conditions, though only very slightly. That is, the limestone carbon skews the normal ratio between C and C found in living things.

It was an even more elaborate hoax than the Paluxy hoax. Therefore, as already noted, Dr.

Jennifer Hillam of the University of Sheffield and Mike Baillie of Queen's University of Belfast and their colleagues were able to date the walkway by a second method, i. There are various methods of cleaning the material, and the activity of each rinse can be measured. We don't need Egyptian mummies or what have you at that point. Judging from the above, it is easy to see that creationists are indulging in wild fishing expeditions.

That is the equilibrium point

An Index to Creationist Claims

No responsible curator would have approved of sacrificing valuable dinosaur fossils for unsuitable tests. Carbon is produced by energetic collisions between cosmic rays and molecules of nitrogen in the upper atmosphere. It hardly seems fair, but that's the way it is.

No responsible curator would

Measurements of the decay rate of K in different substances under various conditions indicate that variations in the chemical and physical environment have no detectable effect on its e. Any carbon-containing liquid originally possessed by that sponge might well leak over time and be replaced by something else. That figure follows directly from the mathematics and, as the atmospheric portion of carbon given above is an approximation, is close enough to Dr. Nor was that just an effect of local weather conditions.

The random character of radioactive decay is a special case of the indeterminacy of quantum theory, as was pointed out in by George Gamow, Ronald Gurney and Edward Condon. However, unless the sponge itself disintegrates, the carbon which holds its fibers together must stay put. If he is referring to the carbon decay curve then he has demonstrated, once again, his ignorance of radiometric dating.